Decision making on various approaches to Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)
Purposes: The purpose of this paper is to compare several approaches to Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) and show how different criteria can be used for dividing the IPA matrix to decision-making fields.
Methodology: The authors performed the IPA analysis basing on the data collected in customer satisfaction survey. The survey was conducted from January to April 2016 in selected dentist’s surgeries in cities Żywiec and Bielsko-Biała (southern Poland). Over 200 questionnaires were distributed, 100 of them returned. The data was used to generate and compare several forms of IPA matrix.
Findings: The study showed how the assumed form of the matrix can determine the qualification of the same attribute to different decision field.
Practical implications: The study may facilitate the selection of appropriate form of matrix used in customer satisfaction surveys. It may be useful in future studies on adequate approach to IPA analysis.
Originality: The paper is based on unpublished, own study.
ABALO PIÑEIRO, J., VARELA MALLOU, J. and RIAL BOUBETA, A. 2006. El análisis de importancia-valoración aplicado a la gestión de servicios. Psicothema, 18(4): 730–737.
BACON, D.R. 2003. A comparison of approaches to Importance–Performance Analysis. Journal of Market Research, 45(1): 55–71.
BIESOK, G. and WYRÓD-WRÓBEL, J. 2015. Podejście do analizy IPA w badaniach satysfakcji klienta. Problemy Jakości, 6: 26–31.
ESKILDSEN, J. K. and KRISTENSEN, K. 2006. Enhancing IPA international. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(1): 40–60.
FUCHS, M. and WEIERMAIR, K. 2003. New perspectives of satisfaction research in tourism destinations. Tourism Review, 58(3): 6–14.
GAJEWSKA, P. and PISKRZYŃSKA, K. 2016. CSI Method of assessing patient satisfaction in selected maternity wards. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 12(5): 277–283.
GUADAGNOLO, F. 1985. The Importance–Performance Analysis: An evaluation and marketing tool. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 3(2): 13–22.
HAAHTI, A. and YAVAS, U. 2004. A multi-attribute approach to understanding image of a theme park. The case of Santa Park in Lapland. European Business Review, 16 (4): 390–397.
JOSEPH, M., ALLBRIGTH, D., STONE, G., SEKHON, Y. and TINSON, J. 2005. IPA of UK and US Bank: Customer perceptions of service delivery technologies. International Journal of Financial Services Management, 1(1): 66–88.
MARTILLA, J. and JAMES, J. 1977. Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1): 77–79.
MATZLER, K. and SAUERWEIN, E. 2002. The factor structure of customer satisfaction. An empirical test of the importance grid and the penalty-reward-contrast analysis. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(4): 314–332.
MENG, L.J. and YUN, CH.T. 2016. Consumer Preference Toward Super-Mini Cars in Malaysia: An Importance-Performance Analysis Approach. Regional Conference on Science. Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2014): 259–268.
OH, H. 2001. Revisiting importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 22 (6): 617–627.
OLBRYCH, B. and ŁOPYTA, B. 2011. Technika IPA jako narzędzie oceny satysfakcji pacjentów w jednostkach ochrony zdrowia. Studies & Proceedings of Polish Association for Knowledge Management. Nr 38. [Online]. Available at: http://www.pszw.edu.pl/images/publikacje/t038_pszw_2011_olbrych_lopyta_-_technika_ipa_jako_narzedzie_oceny_satysfakcji_pacjentow_w_jednostkach_ochrony_zdrowia.pdf. [Accessed: 20 November 2016).
SILVA, F.H. and FERNANDES, P.O. 2011. Importance-performance analysis as a tool in evaluating higher education service quality: the empirical results of ESTiG (IPB). In the 17th International Business Information Management Association Conference. University of Pavia. Milan, Italy. (CD-ROM), 306–315.
TZENG, G.-H. and CHANG, H.-F. 2011. Applying Importance-Performance Analysis as a Service Quality Measure in Food Service Industry. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6 (3): 106–115.
YAVAS, U. and SHEMWELL, D.J. 2001. Modified importance-performance analysis: An application to hospitals. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance Incorporating Leadership in Health Services, 14(2-3): 104–110.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
It is allowed to reuse and remix the journal content in accordance with a CC BY-SA license (free to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially). The license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. All new works based on yours will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use.
European Journal of Business Science and Technology by https://www.ejobsat.cz/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
EJOBSAT allows author/s to retain rights to copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the publication - such as patent rights, the right to use the substance of the publication in future own works (including lectures and books), the right to reproduce the publication for own purposes (not for sale) and the right to self-archive the publication.