Informality, Tax Evasion and the Quality of Business Environment: Evidence from South Caucasian Countries

  • Orkhan Nadirov Orkhan Nadirov, Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tomáš Baťa University in Zlín, Mostní 5139, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic, e-mail:
  • Khatai Aliyev Department of World Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Qafqaz University, Hasan Aliyev 120, AZ0101 Khirdalan,
Keywords: tax evasion, informality, the quality of business environment, South Caucasian countries

Abstract

In many transition countries, a considerable part of economic activity takes place in the informal sector. On the other hand, tax evasion constitutes a major problem and causes improvements to all levels of the informal sector in which the volume of the informal sector in transition countries is much higher than in developed countries. Previous works have examined separately both the determinants of the size of the informal sector and  the determinants of tax evasion for transition countries. But, this  paper complements these significant works by examining cross sectional analysis based on firm-level data for South Caucasian countries. In addition, our  paper has a new contribution to previous works by providing some empirical evidence for informality and tax evasion with the quality of business environment. Building on a simple analytical framework, we test the channels affecting the degree of informality in South Caucasian countries and vice versa, the channels affecting the degree of tax evasion. We use instrumental variable OLS and find that the extent of informality is determined by tax evasion,  as well as the extent of tax evasion is determined by the informality for these countries. In addition, we find that the business environment has implications for both informal economy and tax evasion. These results suggest generally ameliorating the business environment in South Caucasian countries, while strengthening an access to land and financial sources, adequate provision of public capital such as telecommunication, transport and electricity infrastructure will reduce informality,  reigning the corruption, tax administration and labor regulation will reduce tax evasion  and ultimately lead to increasing government revenue collections.

References

Andrew, E. T. and Jean, M. D. 2000. The business environment in Tanzania after socialism: challenges of reforming banks, parastatals, taxation and the civil service. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 38 (4), 683–712.

Buehn, A. and Schneider, F. 2012. Shadow economies around the world: novel insights, accepted knowledge, and new estimates. International Tax and Public Finance, 19, 139–171.

Cebula, R. 1997. An empirical analysis of the impact of government tax and auditing policies on the size of the underground economy: the case of the United States, 1973–94. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 56, 73–186.

Dabla-Norris, E., Gradstein, M. and Inchauste, G. 2008. What causes firms to hide output? The determinants of Informality. Journal of Development Economics, 85, 1–27.

Djankov, S., Lieberman, I., Mukherjee, J. and Nenova, T. 2002. Going Informal: Benefits and Costs, in Belev, B. (ed.) The informal economy in the EU accession countries: Size, Scope, Trends and Challenges to the process of EU enlargement. Centre for the Study of Democracy.

Dollar, D., Iarossi̇, G. and Mengistae, T. 2002. Investment Climate and Economic performance: Some Firm Level Evidence from India, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform working paper no. 143.

Dollar, D., Hallward-Driemei̇r, M. and Mengistae, T. 2003. Investment Climate and Firm Performance in Developing Economies. World Bank, Development Research Group.

Giles, D. and Tedds, L. 2002. Taxes and the Canadian underground economy. Canadian Tax Papers, vol. 106. Canadian Tax Foundation, Toronto.

Grgić, R. and Terzić, S. 2014. Tax evasion in Bosnia and Hercegovina and business environment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 957–966.

Ingram, M., Ramachandran, V. and Desai, V. 2007. Why do firms choose to be informal? Evidence from enterprise surveys in Africa, RPED paper no. 134. Washington D. C. – The Worldbank.

Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D. and Andrei, S. 1997. The unofficial economy in transition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Fall, Washington D. C.

Kaufmann, D. and Kaliberda, A. 1996. Integrating the unofficial economy into the dynamics ofpost socialist economies: A framework of analyses and evidence. In: Kaminski, B. (ed.) Economic Transition in Russia and the New States of Eurasia. London: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 81–120.

Lackó, M. 2000. Hidden Economy – An unknown quantity: Comparative analysis of hidden economics in Transition countries 1989–95, Economics of Transition, 8 (1), 117–149.

Mawajje, J. 2013. Tax evasion, informality and the business environment in Uganda. ERPC, Research Series, 113.

Nadirov, O. and Aliyev, K. 2015. Do high corporate income tax rates demotivate entrepreneurs? The case of Azerbaijan. In: Tichý, T. et al. (ed.) MEKON Selected Papers. Ostrava: VSB-TU Ostrava, pp. 107–119. ISBN 978-80-248-3840-3.

PWC. 2015. Paying Taxes 2015: the global Picture. [online]. Available at: http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/paying-taxes/overall-ranking-and-data-tables.jhtml.

Rauch, J. E. 1991. Modeling the informal sector formally. Journal of Development Economics, 35, 33–47.

Reinikka, R. and Svensson, J. 2002. Coping with poor public capital. Journal of Development Economics, 69, 51–69.

Schneider, F. 2006. Shadow economies and corruption all over the world: what do we really know? CESifo Working Paper No. 1806.

World Bank Group. 2013. Enterprise Surveys. [online]. Available at: http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/.
Published
2015-12-30
Section
Articles